29.7. Conflicts
| Up | Chapter 29. Logical Replication | Home |

## 29.7. Conflicts #

Logical replication behaves similarly to normal DML operations in that the data will be updated even if it was changed locally on the subscriber node. If incoming data violates any constraints the replication will stop. This is referred to as a conflict. When replicating UPDATE or DELETE operations, missing data is also considered as a conflict, but does not result in an error and such operations will simply be skipped.

Additional logging is triggered, and the conflict statistics are collected (displayed in the pg_stat_subscription_stats view) in the following conflict cases:

`insert_exists`

  Inserting a row that violates a `NOT DEFERRABLE` unique constraint. Note that to log the origin and commit timestamp details of the conflicting key, `track_commit_timestamp` should be enabled on the subscriber. In this case, an error will be raised until the conflict is resolved manually.

`update_origin_differs`

  Updating a row that was previously modified by another origin. Note that this conflict can only be detected when `track_commit_timestamp` is enabled on the subscriber. Currently, the update is always applied regardless of the origin of the local row.

`update_exists`

  The updated value of a row violates a `NOT DEFERRABLE` unique constraint. Note that to log the origin and commit timestamp details of the conflicting key, `track_commit_timestamp` should be enabled on the subscriber. In this case, an error will be raised until the conflict is resolved manually. Note that when updating a partitioned table, if the updated row value satisfies another partition constraint resulting in the row being inserted into a new partition, the `insert_exists` conflict may arise if the new row violates a `NOT DEFERRABLE` unique constraint.

`update_missing`

  The row to be updated was not found. The update will simply be skipped in this scenario.

`delete_origin_differs`

  Deleting a row that was previously modified by another origin. Note that this conflict can only be detected when `track_commit_timestamp` is enabled on the subscriber. Currently, the delete is always applied regardless of the origin of the local row.

`delete_missing`

  The row to be deleted was not found. The delete will simply be skipped in this scenario.

`multiple_unique_conflicts`

  Inserting or updating a row violates multiple `NOT DEFERRABLE` unique constraints. Note that to log the origin and commit timestamp details of conflicting keys, ensure that `track_commit_timestamp` is enabled on the subscriber. In this case, an error will be raised until the conflict is resolved manually.

Note that there are other conflict scenarios, such as exclusion constraint violations. Currently, we do not provide additional details for them in the log.

The log format for logical replication conflicts is as follows:

    LOG:  conflict detected on relation "schemaname.tablename": conflict=conflict_type
    DETAIL:  detailed_explanation.
    {detail_values [; ... ]}.

    where detail_values is one of:

        Key (column_name [, ...])=(column_value [, ...])
        existing local row [(column_name [, ...])=](column_value [, ...])
        remote row [(column_name [, ...])=](column_value [, ...])
        replica identity {(column_name [, ...])=(column_value [, ...]) | full [(column_name [, ...])=](column_value [, ...])}

The log provides the following information:

`LOG`

  - `schemaname`.`tablename` identifies the local relation involved in the conflict.

  - `conflict_type` is the type of conflict that occurred (e.g., `insert_exists`, `update_exists`).

`DETAIL`

  - `detailed_explanation` includes the origin, transaction ID, and commit timestamp of the transaction that modified the existing local row, if available.

  - The `Key` section includes the key values of the local row that violated a unique constraint for `insert_exists`, `update_exists` or `multiple_unique_conflicts` conflicts.

  - The `existing local row` section includes the local row if its origin differs from the remote row for `update_origin_differs` or `delete_origin_differs` conflicts, or if the key value conflicts with the remote row for `insert_exists`, `update_exists` or `multiple_unique_conflicts` conflicts.

  - The `remote row` section includes the new row from the remote insert or update operation that caused the conflict. Note that for an update operation, the column value of the new row will be null if the value is unchanged and toasted.

  - The `replica identity` section includes the replica identity key values that were used to search for the existing local row to be updated or deleted. This may include the full row value if the local relation is marked with `REPLICA IDENTITY FULL`.

  - `column_name` is the column name. For `existing local row`, `remote row`, and `replica identity full` cases, column names are logged only if the user lacks the privilege to access all columns of the table. If column names are present, they appear in the same order as the corresponding column values.

  - `column_value` is the column value. The large column values are truncated to 64 bytes.

  - Note that in case of `multiple_unique_conflicts` conflict, multiple `detailed_explanation` and `detail_values` lines will be generated, each detailing the conflict information associated with distinct unique constraints.

Logical replication operations are performed with the privileges of the role which owns the subscription. Permissions failures on target tables will cause replication conflicts, as will enabled row-level security on target tables that the subscription owner is subject to, without regard to whether any policy would ordinarily reject the INSERT, UPDATE, DELETE or TRUNCATE which is being replicated. This restriction on row-level security may be lifted in a future version of PostgreSQL™.

A conflict that produces an error will stop the replication; it must be resolved manually by the user. Details about the conflict can be found in the subscriber's server log.

The resolution can be done either by changing data or permissions on the subscriber so that it does not conflict with the incoming change or by skipping the transaction that conflicts with the existing data. When a conflict produces an error, the replication won't proceed, and the logical replication worker will emit the following kind of message to the subscriber's server log:

    ERROR:  conflict detected on relation "public.test": conflict=insert_exists
    DETAIL:  Key already exists in unique index "t_pkey", which was modified locally in transaction 740 at 2024-06-26 10:47:04.727375+08.
    Key (c)=(1); existing local row (1, 'local'); remote row (1, 'remote').
    CONTEXT:  processing remote data for replication origin "pg_16395" during "INSERT" for replication target relation "public.test" in transaction 725 finished at 0/14C0378

The LSN of the transaction that contains the change violating the constraint and the replication origin name can be found from the server log (LSN 0/14C0378 and replication origin `pg_16395` in the above case). The transaction that produced the conflict can be skipped by using ALTER SUBSCRIPTION ... SKIP with the finish LSN (i.e., LSN 0/14C0378). The finish LSN could be an LSN at which the transaction is committed or prepared on the publisher. Alternatively, the transaction can also be skipped by calling the `pg_replication_origin_advance()` function. Before using this function, the subscription needs to be disabled temporarily either by ALTER SUBSCRIPTION ... DISABLE or, the subscription can be used with the `disable_on_error` option. Then, you can use `pg_replication_origin_advance()` function with the `node_name` (i.e., `pg_16395`) and the next LSN of the finish LSN (i.e., 0/14C0379). The current position of origins can be seen in the pg_replication_origin_status system view. Please note that skipping the whole transaction includes skipping changes that might not violate any constraint. This can easily make the subscriber inconsistent. The additional details regarding conflicting rows, such as their origin and commit timestamp can be seen in the `DETAIL` line of the log. But note that this information is only available when `track_commit_timestamp` is enabled on the subscriber. Users can use this information to decide whether to retain the local change or adopt the remote alteration. For instance, the `DETAIL` line in the above log indicates that the existing row was modified locally. Users can manually perform a remote-change-win.

When the `streaming` mode is `parallel`, the finish LSN of failed transactions may not be logged. In that case, it may be necessary to change the streaming mode to `on` or `off` and cause the same conflicts again so the finish LSN of the failed transaction will be written to the server log. For the usage of finish LSN, please refer to ALTER SUBSCRIPTION ... SKIP.

| Up |
| Home |