This section describes the argument syntax of the standard utilities and introduces terminology used throughout IEEE Std 1003.1-2001 for describing the arguments processed by the utilities.
Within IEEE Std 1003.1-2001, a special notation is used for describing the syntax of a utility's arguments. Unless otherwise noted, all utility descriptions use this notation, which is illustrated by this example (see the Shell and Utilities volume of IEEE Std 1003.1-2001, Section 2.9.1, Simple Commands):
utility_name[-a][-b][-c option_argument] [-d|-e][-foption_argument][operand...]
The notation used for the SYNOPSIS sections imposes requirements on the implementors of the standard utilities and provides a simple reference for the application developer or system user.
The utility in the example is named utility_name. It is followed by options, option-arguments, and operands. The arguments that consist of hyphens and single letters or digits, such as 'a' , are known as "options" (or, historically, "flags"). Certain options are followed by an "option-argument", as shown with [ -c option_argument]. The arguments following the last options and option-arguments are named "operands".
Option-arguments are sometimes shown separated from their options by <blank>s, sometimes directly adjacent. This reflects the situation that in some cases an option-argument is included within the same argument string as the option; in most cases it is the next argument. The Utility Syntax Guidelines in Utility Syntax Guidelines require that the option be a separate argument from its option-argument, but there are some exceptions in IEEE Std 1003.1-2001 to ensure continued operation of historical applications:
If the SYNOPSIS of a standard utility shows a <space> between an option and option-argument (as with [ -c option_argument] in the example), a conforming application shall use separate arguments for that option and its option-argument.
If a <space> is not shown (as with [ -f option_argument] in the example), a conforming application shall place an option and its option-argument directly adjacent in the same argument string, without intervening <blank>s.
Notwithstanding the preceding requirements on conforming applications, a conforming implementation shall permit an application to specify options and option-arguments as a single argument or as separate arguments whether or not a <space> is shown on the synopsis line, [XSI] except in those cases (marked with the XSI portability warning) where an option-argument is optional and no separation can be used.
A standard utility may also be implemented to operate correctly when the required separation into multiple arguments is violated by a non-conforming application.
Options are usually listed in alphabetical order unless this would make the utility description more confusing. There are no implied relationships between the options based upon the order in which they appear, unless otherwise stated in the OPTIONS section, or unless the exception in Guideline 11 of Utility Syntax Guidelines applies. If an option that does not have option-arguments is repeated, the results are undefined, unless otherwise stated.
Frequently, names of parameters that require substitution by actual values are shown with embedded underscores. Alternatively, parameters are shown as follows:
The angle brackets are used for the symbolic grouping of a phrase representing a single parameter and conforming applications shall not include them in data submitted to the utility.
When a utility has only a few permissible options, they are sometimes shown individually, as in the example. Utilities with many flags generally show all of the individual flags (that do not take option-arguments) grouped, as in:
utility_name [-abcDxyz][-p arg][operand]
Utilities with very complex arguments may be shown as follows:
Unless otherwise specified, whenever an operand or option-argument is, or contains, a numeric value:
The number is interpreted as a decimal integer.
Numerals in the range 0 to 2147483647 are syntactically recognized as numeric values.
When the utility description states that it accepts negative numbers as operands or option-arguments, numerals in the range -2147483647 to 2147483647 are syntactically recognized as numeric values.
Ranges greater than those listed here are allowed.
This does not mean that all numbers within the allowable range are necessarily semantically correct. A standard utility that accepts an option-argument or operand that is to be interpreted as a number, and for which a range of values smaller than that shown above is permitted by the IEEE Std 1003.1-2001, describes that smaller range along with the description of the option-argument or operand. If an error is generated, the utility's diagnostic message shall indicate that the value is out of the supported range, not that it is syntactically incorrect.
Arguments or option-arguments enclosed in the '[' and ']' notation are optional and can be omitted. Conforming applications shall not include the '[' and ']' symbols in data submitted to the utility.
Arguments separated by the '|' vertical bar notation are mutually-exclusive. Conforming applications shall not include the '|' symbol in data submitted to the utility. Alternatively, mutually-exclusive options and operands may be listed with multiple synopsis lines. For example:
utility_name -d[-a][-c option_argument][operand...] utility_name[-a][-b][operand...]
When multiple synopsis lines are given for a utility, it is an indication that the utility has mutually-exclusive arguments. These mutually-exclusive arguments alter the functionality of the utility so that only certain other arguments are valid in combination with one of the mutually-exclusive arguments. Only one of the mutually-exclusive arguments is allowed for invocation of the utility. Unless otherwise stated in an accompanying OPTIONS section, the relationships between arguments depicted in the SYNOPSIS sections are mandatory requirements placed on conforming applications. The use of conflicting mutually-exclusive arguments produces undefined results, unless a utility description specifies otherwise. When an option is shown without the '[' and ']' brackets, it means that option is required for that version of the SYNOPSIS. However, it is not required to be the first argument, as shown in the example above, unless otherwise stated.
Ellipses ( "..." ) are used to denote that one or more occurrences of an option or operand are allowed. When an option or an operand followed by ellipses is enclosed in brackets, zero or more options or operands can be specified. The forms:
utility_name -f option_argument...[operand...] utility_name [-g option_argument]...[operand...]
indicate that multiple occurrences of the option and its option-argument preceding the ellipses are valid, with semantics as indicated in the OPTIONS section of the utility. (See also Guideline 11 in Utility Syntax Guidelines .) In the first example, each option-argument requires a preceding -f and at least one -f option_argument must be given.
When the synopsis line is too long to be printed on a single line in the Shell and Utilities volume of IEEE Std 1003.1-2001, the indented lines following the initial line are continuation lines. An actual use of the command would appear on a single logical line.
The following guidelines are established for the naming of utilities and for the specification of options, option-arguments, and operands. The getopt() function in the System Interfaces volume of IEEE Std 1003.1-2001 assists utilities in handling options and operands that conform to these guidelines.
Operands and option-arguments can contain characters not specified in the portable character set.
The guidelines are intended to provide guidance to the authors of future utilities, such as those written specific to a local system or that are components of a larger application. Some of the standard utilities do not conform to all of these guidelines; in those cases, the OPTIONS sections describe the deviations.
Multi-digit options should not be allowed.
The utilities in the Shell and Utilities volume of IEEE Std 1003.1-2001 that claim conformance to these guidelines shall conform completely to these guidelines as if these guidelines contained the term "shall" instead of "should". On some implementations, the utilities accept usage in violation of these guidelines for backwards-compatibility as well as accepting the required form.
It is recommended that all future utilities and applications use these guidelines to enhance user portability. The fact that some historical utilities could not be changed (to avoid breaking existing applications) should not deter this future goal.